Dog Bites in New York: One Bite Rule vs. Strict Liability for Dangerous Dogs
CaseConnect Editorial ·
New York uses a mixed approach to dog bite liability—strict liability for medical costs, but negligence principles for pain and suffering. Understanding this distinction can affect how you pursue your claim.
New York's approach to dog bite liability is more nuanced than many other states. Under current New York law, a dog owner is strictly liable for a victim's medical costs if their dog bites someone. However, to recover non-economic damages like pain and suffering, the victim must establish that the owner knew or should have known the dog had vicious propensities.
"Vicious propensities" doesn't necessarily mean the dog has bitten someone before. Courts have allowed evidence of aggressive behavior short of a bite: growling, snapping, jumping aggressively on people, or chasing pedestrians.
This hybrid system creates a practical divide in dog bite litigation. For victims with primarily medical bills, the strict liability standard provides a relatively straightforward recovery. For victims with significant pain, scarring, or psychological trauma, proving the owner's prior knowledge becomes essential.
New York's Agriculture and Markets Law also contains provisions allowing courts to declare a dog "dangerous" after a hearing, which can result in the owner being ordered to take specific containment measures. A prior dangerous dog declaration is powerful evidence of knowledge in a subsequent injury case.
Were You Injured in an Accident?
A personal injury attorney can evaluate your case for free — no upfront costs, ever.
Get a Free Case Review